Nabiollah Gholami; Hussein gholami
Abstract
Explaining new phenomena and events in various fields using macro and interdisciplinary theories and strategies is on of the practical tools for better understanding of these phenomena in order to adopt appropriate management-executive approaches to them. Therefore, understanding the concept of "Sovernment ...
Read More
Explaining new phenomena and events in various fields using macro and interdisciplinary theories and strategies is on of the practical tools for better understanding of these phenomena in order to adopt appropriate management-executive approaches to them. Therefore, understanding the concept of "Sovernment Crime" as a systematic violation of citizens' rights by the government, under "Game Theory" as one of the strategic theories to explain phenomena and events in the fields of social sciences and international relations, is a matter that is both from the perspective of understanding and promotion. The so-called government crime literature is worthy of attention in terms of attention to the objective and practical aspects of identifying and responding to government crimes. Therefore, in this article, considering the state and citizens as two main actors in different fields, and using the principles and elements of game theory, it has been argued that the actors participating in a game have rationality and by calculating their possible profit and loss participate in the game process and seek maximum profit and minimum loss. These actors reach equilibrium at a point known as the saddle point - in which each actor has gained a certain amount of profit and loss. This point is the point where it is no longer possible to receive more profit and less loss for any of the parties, and if the game continues, they will suffer a decrease in profit and an increase in loss. Finally, it has been concluded that the states, with tools such as bringing other actors into their playing field with citizens, using rents and information tools, changing the rules and regulations governing the game, cause the balance to be disturbed and the saddle point to be shifted to turned towards themselves and thus cause systematic violation of citizens' rights.
Nabiollah Gholami
Abstract
Bipolar Personality Disorder from the Viewpoint of the Criminal Liability Seyyed Mansour Mirsaeidi[1]– Nabiollah Gholami[2] (Received: 23/ 05/ 2017 - Accepted: 8/ 11/ 2016) Abstract From the view of Iran's criminal law, a person suffering from the mental disorder, ...
Read More
Bipolar Personality Disorder from the Viewpoint of the Criminal Liability Seyyed Mansour Mirsaeidi[1]– Nabiollah Gholami[2] (Received: 23/ 05/ 2017 - Accepted: 8/ 11/ 2016) Abstract From the view of Iran's criminal law, a person suffering from the mental disorder, to be considered as insane, must lack the will and distinguishing power. This general principle is common in all mental disorders. However, determining how many mental disorders divest will and distinguishing power is not an easy job. A bipolar personality disorder is one of the mental disorders which is inflicted in many misconceptions and challenges from the view of determining criminal liability. In this paper, by investigating the criminal responsibility of patients suffering from the bipolar personality disorder, we conclude that this disorder cannot be a factor to eliminate criminal liability except for hududd crimes. However, in other crimes, it can be considered a factor to moderate the criminal liability. [1]. Assistant Professor in Criminal Law and Criminology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran. [2]. Ph.D. Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, (Corresponding Author): nabiollah.gholami@yahoo.com
Nabiollah Gholami
Abstract
Hostage-taking as a crime with the aim of forcing a third party to commit or omit to do something has been of interest to criminals. The need to deal with this crime because of its domestic and international consequences has led to more attention of criminal legal systems to deal with it at the ...
Read More
Hostage-taking as a crime with the aim of forcing a third party to commit or omit to do something has been of interest to criminals. The need to deal with this crime because of its domestic and international consequences has led to more attention of criminal legal systems to deal with it at the national and international level. The criminalization of such deed in the statute of International Criminal Court (1998) as one of the examples of war crimes is an indicator of the depth of concern of international community about the given crime. Convention against taking a hostage (1979), as the most important document tailored for this crime, has obliged the member countries to impose criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of this crime. According to the Iranian legal system, in spite of the adoption of this Convention in the Parliament, certain criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of this crime have not been established. Hence, in the cases of committing this crime, there is not a same procedure in order to determine the punishment for its perpetrators. In this paper, reviewing the Convention and other international documents and related provisions in Iran, determining the constitutive elements of this crime, the penalties applicable in the case have been investigated.
